The bill on wiretaps is wrong because it severely limits the ability of the police investigation and the judiciary. The Democratic Party is strongly opposed at first reading in the House, the Senate returns from the text that has not improved, except in minor respects, and can appeal to a vote of confidence is likely to limit further debate and opportunities to amend the text .
The bill is wrong because, for example, restricts the use of intercettazioni telefoniche per acquisire prove, limita il ricorso alle intercettazioni ambientali senza legare il limite temporale alle indagini ma fissando parametri arbitrari, definiti con una norma, quindi noti – in alcuni paesi come l’Australia il limite viene fissato dalle forze dell’ordine e dagli inquirenti e varia a seconda del tipo di indagine e dell’ipotesi di reato.
Per limitare gli abusi sulla pubblicazione dei contenuti di intercettazioni telefoniche – qualche volta coperte dal segreto istruttorio altre volte assolutamente svincolate da ogni indagine o ipotesi di reato – si penalizza la sicurezza di tutti e la capacità di rispondere al crimine, soprattutto quello organizzato.
Possiamo convenire sulla and also the urgent need for reform of the wiretaps. We can be in total agreement on the strongest condemnation for the publication of evidence or the real gossip media: in one case has caused damage in the first investigations of privacy then the quality of our journalism. But it is equally unacceptable that prohibits the publication of the investigations to the public the contents of which are to reaching out to citizens.
And it's a mistake to introduce the formula of "summary", that is also editorializzano the facts, evidence and crimes.
A good law was possible, would have been possible, even if the majority wanted - instead of to gag information - just hit the right target, ie the leak by the prosecutor. And then sanctions and penalties for their publication.
The bill on wiretaps should be in the opposite direction.
The Italian press abroad followed the evolution of the story, he gave information, and also took position on the issue which concerns the freedom of information and thus affects us all. Of course, I'm thinking it would be interesting to see a post-approval penalty for a violation of the rules occurred in the pages of a newspaper published in Caracas, New York, Toronto or Melbourne. Here, too, is foreign part of a gray area regarding the application of Italian law in another country. Government and most have other tools to take action against the Italian press abroad cuts publishing. It is therefore encouraging to see directors of major newspapers of the Italian language in the world take a stand on this issue: a signal of seriousness and commitment to professional and ethical - because on this issue throughout the world of information, beyond traditional lines of demarcation between the left and right, took common positions. But also a sign of autonomy. In comparison, similarly, the choice of those who have pursued the simple way of information, not participating in the day of "silence" feeling abroad that may not be included.
The bill is wrong because, for example, restricts the use of intercettazioni telefoniche per acquisire prove, limita il ricorso alle intercettazioni ambientali senza legare il limite temporale alle indagini ma fissando parametri arbitrari, definiti con una norma, quindi noti – in alcuni paesi come l’Australia il limite viene fissato dalle forze dell’ordine e dagli inquirenti e varia a seconda del tipo di indagine e dell’ipotesi di reato.
Per limitare gli abusi sulla pubblicazione dei contenuti di intercettazioni telefoniche – qualche volta coperte dal segreto istruttorio altre volte assolutamente svincolate da ogni indagine o ipotesi di reato – si penalizza la sicurezza di tutti e la capacità di rispondere al crimine, soprattutto quello organizzato.
Possiamo convenire sulla and also the urgent need for reform of the wiretaps. We can be in total agreement on the strongest condemnation for the publication of evidence or the real gossip media: in one case has caused damage in the first investigations of privacy then the quality of our journalism. But it is equally unacceptable that prohibits the publication of the investigations to the public the contents of which are to reaching out to citizens.
And it's a mistake to introduce the formula of "summary", that is also editorializzano the facts, evidence and crimes.
A good law was possible, would have been possible, even if the majority wanted - instead of to gag information - just hit the right target, ie the leak by the prosecutor. And then sanctions and penalties for their publication.
The bill on wiretaps should be in the opposite direction.
The Italian press abroad followed the evolution of the story, he gave information, and also took position on the issue which concerns the freedom of information and thus affects us all. Of course, I'm thinking it would be interesting to see a post-approval penalty for a violation of the rules occurred in the pages of a newspaper published in Caracas, New York, Toronto or Melbourne. Here, too, is foreign part of a gray area regarding the application of Italian law in another country. Government and most have other tools to take action against the Italian press abroad cuts publishing. It is therefore encouraging to see directors of major newspapers of the Italian language in the world take a stand on this issue: a signal of seriousness and commitment to professional and ethical - because on this issue throughout the world of information, beyond traditional lines of demarcation between the left and right, took common positions. But also a sign of autonomy. In comparison, similarly, the choice of those who have pursued the simple way of information, not participating in the day of "silence" feeling abroad that may not be included.
Hon Marco Fedi
0 comments:
Post a Comment