Until yesterday afternoon, the vote of confidence seemed to appeal granted. On the one hand an order, such as the reorganization of the entertainment world and foundations opera and symphony, which was a united front of opposition and that, already in the Senate, despite some changes, he found strong opposition on the other hand the risk of changes in the House that would require a third reading in the Senate within very close - June 29 - a decline of decree.
Evidently the government and the majority felt there were conditions to accommodate some important amendments tabled by the opposition - some related to employment and the rights of working men and women from the entertainment world - and therefore with a sense of responsibility, remaining the strong negative feedback on the measure, the PD has withdrawn many amendments accepted a debate on amendments that were accepted and others to be considered by the court and the classroom.
I think it is necessary to recognize the right of each parliamentary group to organize their opposition, but action is necessary to clarify that the choice of the Democratic Party - of limit the damage and to take action amendment that has had a positive effect - has not changed in any way the negative assessments - to method, form and content - on this measure. The sitting
river, decided by the majority, has helped to highlight two ways of making opposition in the context of a unanimously negative opinion on the measure - said the Hon. Marco Fedi.
I think it is useful at this time so that, at the different choices they make and opposition, will help to strengthen the majority and to weaken the opposition.
Evidently the government and the majority felt there were conditions to accommodate some important amendments tabled by the opposition - some related to employment and the rights of working men and women from the entertainment world - and therefore with a sense of responsibility, remaining the strong negative feedback on the measure, the PD has withdrawn many amendments accepted a debate on amendments that were accepted and others to be considered by the court and the classroom.
I think it is necessary to recognize the right of each parliamentary group to organize their opposition, but action is necessary to clarify that the choice of the Democratic Party - of limit the damage and to take action amendment that has had a positive effect - has not changed in any way the negative assessments - to method, form and content - on this measure. The sitting
river, decided by the majority, has helped to highlight two ways of making opposition in the context of a unanimously negative opinion on the measure - said the Hon. Marco Fedi.
I think it is useful at this time so that, at the different choices they make and opposition, will help to strengthen the majority and to weaken the opposition.
0 comments:
Post a Comment