Almost a month away from the loss of our dear Master, prof. Cipriani, I wonder about the fate of his studies, that fascinate him so much, to be completely absorbed for hours. Each new discovery added a piece a picture that was perfected by now, so they seemed likely, since you can only verosomiglianza speak, for how hard you can do, you can be sure of being riusciti ad arrivare al solido cuore della verità. Questo era il Suo obiettivo principale: ricostruire gli avvenimenti che avevano portato alla realizzazione dell’attuale codice di procedura civile, spesso facendo parlare in prima persona gli autori di quelli avvenimenti, perché ciò che accade avviene per mano degli uomini, ed è naturale che anch’essi debbano entrare a far parte “dell’intero disegno”.
Mi riferisco principalmente a Piero Calamandrei, principale ispiratore del codice di procedura civile insieme a Carnelutti e Redenti, e del quale Egli nutriva una viva passione, un enorme entusiasmo che ha trasmesso a chi ha avuto la fortuna, (And I refer mainly to me), to attend his lectures, sometimes a little 'sui generis and seasoned with irony, which the Professor seemed physiologically established.
few months before it failed, and precisely in the month of December, took the unusual variety of documents at the State Archives, the same evening he called me to warn me to want to publish in the journal - Civil Due Process, the last issue of this year, coinciding with the 70th anniversary of the promulgation of the Code of Civil Procedure, which as we all know it happened on October 28, 1940. Unfortunately, the professor had no the time to write something about those papers, the less I think they are, at this point, published, because without his commentary, there are only "paper orphans" of a director, needed to bring order to the events of that period, because it is fair to say that he was only to deepen the that thorny issue related to the drafting of a code of fascist-inspired, drawing much criticism, which in most cases did not contribute to play a role in verifying heuristic of the facts, but which were, and remain, nothing but criticism.
The last time we met, one week before the sad event, asked me to write a short piece on the Latin maxim dum pendet Realise , a result of some recent findings, conducted by myself and a tonne on possible origins of that maxim . He had argued in his book Piero Calamandrei and civil procedure ESI Edizioni, 2007, p. 243, that was the result of an adaptation made by Piero Calamandrei macaroni, there are no endings in Latin Realise. In fact the first volume of The Diary of Sigmund Manci (1756-1762), edited by Marco Stenico, Trento, 2004, p. 94, contains the following statement: "Seeing no response be from Vienna to any possession, congietura you for sure that you leave prolong Firmian, imperoché pendet dum, understand . Furthermore, in a book titled Giuntini Fulignati-company of the famous Hvar-DIALOGUE, chapters, reasoning, dated 1647, states on page 65: "Too many would want us to deal with ways to win: why should this lead to almost all sciences and the arts, as would the cavillationi de 'jurists and prosecutors, and holidays, and deadlines to take the long fights, because dum pendet lis, crumena Realise. " Finally, Ton told me he had found the same expression, although the proposal in a key diversa (finchè il ramo pende, rende) in una raccolta di proverbi molfettesi curata da Rosaria Scardigno, Nuovo lessico molfettese – italiano, 1963, p. 386, segno che l’espressione non poteva essere attribuita in alcun modo a Calamandrei.
Detto questo, intendo rendere noti un paio di quei documenti che affidai al caro Professore, riservandomi di pubblicare, nelle sedi opportune, i risultati di quelle ricerche alla quali Egli mi condusse, attraverso il suo entusiasmo e la passione per lo studio che lo hanno sempre accompagnato fino all’ultimo momento. Egli è stato il vento, trascinante da non potergli resistere, e forte, da non poter essere dimenticato.
____________________
Roma, 19 ottobre 1941 XIX
Caro professore,
mi è giunto graditissimo il Vostro gustoso dialogo.
Ho incominciato a leggerlo con tanto piacere. È stata, la Vostra, un’idea veramente felice che avrà un successo practice of persuasion which can not achieve certain treaties.
And now we wait for the continuation of your magnificent institutions.
accept my most cordial greetings
your
F.to Mandrioli
Cav. of Gr.Cr. Prof. Piero Calamandrei
Albizi Borgo, 14
FLORENCE
____________________________
Roma, 2 febbraio 1943 XXI
Carissimo professore,
ho letto oggi il vostro scritto sulla certezza del diritto e la responsabilità della dottrina.
Spero non Vi dispiaccia ricevere i miei più vivi ringraziamenti per la luce che ne emana e per la chiarificazione, benefica certo per me, ma ritengo anche per altri moltissimi.
Coi migliori saluti
Vostro
F.to Mandrioli
Cav. di Gr. Cr. Avv. Prof. Piero CALAMANDREI
Borgo Albizi , 14
_____________________
Rome, April 15, 1942 XX
Dear Professor,
I received regular folders for your circular on guidelines for implementing the new Code.
Thank you much on behalf of the Minister for your fatigue, as expected has perfectly matched the expectation. As for comfort not have any concerns because he was fully aware and found good and faithful to your revision. also is concerned about the well-known judgments partial instructions are being developed on the transitional rules that have become clear to all.
And then we rely on good will of the people and the Divine Providence.
Please accept my cordial greetings
F.to Mandrioli
Cav. of Cr Gr. Prof. Piero Calamandrei
Albizi Borgo, 14
FLORENCE
0 comments:
Post a Comment