Thursday, February 25, 2010

What Causes Scabs In My Nose

Archives Piero Calamandrei

The days of 20 and 21 October 2009 marked one of the important steps for the reconstruction of the legal terms of a major underlying the Code of Civil Procedure of 1940. Calamandrei , fascinating and controversial, as has been described by Perfecto Andres Ibanez in the English version of Faith in the law, can be considered a summary of the communis opinio that the lawyer has, more than fifty years after his death. In the ideal frame of Montepulciano, in Tuscany, a place of childhood and always at the heart of Calamandrei, in these two days has made the point about the state of recovery, archiving and digitization of the material provided by his granddaughter Silvia Calamandrei , and lying in Trento, Rome, Florence and Montepulciano.
The title of the days, not surprisingly calls: A kaleidoscope of cards, effectively represents the state and the mass of a fair amount of material cataloged by Dr. Francesca place, very interesting for scholars, not only of the legal because it is recalled that the four funds are considered "archives in person, but also for those who, are aimed to reconstruct a historical moment, which necessarily contains the ideological substrate on which are grafted the following legislative and policy of the law that affected the drafting of the code of Civil Procedure.
The goal is certainly pretentious and funds alone will not suffice to make clear those events on which more than one occasion, he preferred not to linger, as if to hide faults that nobody has ever heard of giving. Are known, in fact, the discussions around the nature of the codes, and the stone of scandal seems to be just the Code of Civil Procedure, l’unico , a parer di molti, a non aver subito quella corrente ideologica, chiamata fascismo , che travolse scuole di ogni ordine e grado, magistratura, sindacati e modi di vivere.
La questione del colore politico dei codici non è di poco conto, se si pensa all’attività dello studioso, che indaga e descrive l’oggetto della sua indagine. Egli lo fa con obiettività , imparzialità , dedizione, per poi arrivare a trarre le conclusioni , come si usa dire , a dimostrare la sua tesi. Se un altro studioso , nello stesso campo d’indagine giunge ad una tesi opposta , allora qualcosa non va. La verità può essere una pietra sfaccettata che brilla più o meno intensamente a seconda del punto da cui la you look, but can not be Janus-faced. The conclusions are twofold: a) someone's objective is to seek the truth, b) the truth has not been proved. In either case it is right to insist on supporting the results of their investigation, because in the former case, the aporia of the contents of those who claim otherwise must necessarily yield to the evidence, in either case we are only doing what we set out to do at the beginning of our course of study.

0 comments:

Post a Comment